TY  - JOUR
AU  - Nishizaki, Yuji
AU  - Kuroki, Haruo
AU  - Ishii, So
AU  - Ohtsu, Shigeyuki
AU  - Watanabe, Chizuru
AU  - Nishizawa, Hiroto
AU  - Nagao, Masashi
AU  - Nojima, Masanori
AU  - Watanabe, Ryo
AU  - Sato, Daisuke
AU  - Sato, Kensuke
AU  - Kawata, Yumi
AU  - Wada, Hiroo
AU  - Toyoda, Goichiro
AU  - Ohbayashi, Katsumi
PY  - 2023
DA  - 2023/6/8
TI  - Determining Optimal Intervals for In-Person Visits During Video-Based Telemedicine Among Patients With Hypertension: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial
JO  - JMIR Cardio
SP  - e45230
VL  - 7
KW  - hypertension
KW  - Japan
KW  - lost productivity time
KW  - patient satisfaction
KW  - telemedicine
AB  - Background: Introducing telemedicine in outpatient treatment may improve patient satisfaction and convenience. However, the optimal in-person visit interval for video-based telemedicine among patients with hypertension remains unreported in Japan. Objective: We determined the optimal in-person visit interval for video-based telemedicine among patients with hypertension. Methods: This was a cluster randomized controlled noninferiority trial. The target sites were 8 clinics in Japan that had a telemedicine system, and the target patients were individuals with essential hypertension. Among patients receiving video-based telemedicine, those who underwent in-person visits at 6-month intervals were included in the intervention group, and those who underwent in-person visits at 3-month intervals were included in the control group. The follow-up period of the participants was 6 months. The primary end point of the study was the change in systolic blood pressure, and the secondary end points were the rate of treatment continuation after 6 months, patient satisfaction, health economic evaluation, and safety evaluation. Results: Overall, 64 patients were enrolled. Their mean age was 54.5 (SD 10.3) years, and 60.9% (39/64) of patients were male. For the primary end point, the odds ratio for the estimated difference in the change in systolic blood pressure between the 2 groups was 1.18 (90% CI –3.68 to 6.04). Notably, the criteria for noninferiority were met. Patient satisfaction was higher in the intervention group than in the control group. Furthermore, the indirect costs indicated that lost productivity was significantly lesser in the intervention group than in the control group. Moreover, the treatment continuation rate did not differ between the intervention and control groups, and there were no adverse events in either group. Conclusions: Blood pressure control status and safety did not differ between the intervention and control groups. In-person visits at 6-month intervals may cause a societal cost reduction and improve patient satisfaction during video-based telemedicine. Trial Registration: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN-CTR) UMIN000040953; https://tinyurl.com/2p8devm9 
SN  - 2561-1011
UR  - https://cardio.jmir.org/2023/1/e45230
UR  - https://doi.org/10.2196/45230
UR  - http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37161483
DO  - 10.2196/45230
ID  - info:doi/10.2196/45230
ER  -