Published on in Vol 5, No 2 (2021): Jul-Dec

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at, first published .
Patient Perspectives on Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care Program for Chronic Heart Failure (ITEC-CHF): Usability Study

Patient Perspectives on Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care Program for Chronic Heart Failure (ITEC-CHF): Usability Study

Patient Perspectives on Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care Program for Chronic Heart Failure (ITEC-CHF): Usability Study

Original Paper

1School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science, Curtin University, Perth, Australia

2Department of Community Health, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia

3The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity Unit, Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation, Melbourne, Australia

4RECOVER Injury Research Centre, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

5The Australian e-Health Research Centre, Health and Biosecurity Unit, Commonwealth Scientific & Industrial Research Organisation, Brisbane, Australia

6PCH-Northside Clinical Unit School, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

7Department of Cardiology, Peninsula Health, Melbourne, Australia

8Peninsula Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

9Allied Health Department and Advanced Heart Failure and Cardiac Transplant Service, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Perth, Australia

*these authors contributed equally

Corresponding Author:

Andrew Maiorana, PhD

School of Physiotherapy and Exercise Science

Curtin University

GPO Box U1987

Perth, 6845


Phone: 61 8 9266 9225


Background: Telemonitoring enables care providers to remotely support outpatients in self-managing chronic heart failure (CHF), but little is known about the usability and patients’ willingness to engage with this technology.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate feedback from patients with CHF following participation in the Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care program for CHF (ITEC-CHF) study.

Methods: The telemonitoring intervention consisted of three components: remote weight monitoring, structured telephone support, and nurse-led collaborative care. Participants were provided with electronic weighing scales (W550; ForaCare), and a computer tablet (Galaxy Tab A; Samsung). They were asked to weigh themselves on the provided scales daily. Telemonitoring was integrated with a personal assistance call service and a nurse care service according to their workflows in usual care. Feedback on the usability of ITEC-CHF was collected via survey from study participants following 6 months of receiving telemonitoring care for their body weight. Survey responses were provided on a 5-point Likert scale and through open-ended questions to determine participants’ perceived benefits and barriers to using ITEC-CHF.

Results: A total of 67 participants (49/67, 73% male), with a mean age of 69.8 (SD 12.4) years completed the survey. The majority of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the ITEC-CHF program was easy to use (61/67, 91%), easy to navigate (51/65, 78%), useful (59/65, 91%), and made them feel more confident in managing their weight (57/67, 85%). Themes related to participants’ perceptions of telemonitoring included increased support for early intervention of clinical deterioration, improved compliance to daily weighing, a sense of reassurance, and improved self-care and accountability, among others.

Conclusions: ITEC-CHF was rated highly on usability and was well accepted by users as part of their routine self-management activities. Participants were willing to use telemonitoring because they perceived a broad spectrum of benefits for CHF management.

Trial Registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ID ACTRN 12614000916640;

JMIR Cardio 2021;5(2):e24611



Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a complex disease that is expensive to manage and affects approximately 2%-3% of the adult population [1], with a prevalence that continues to increase [2]. Daily weight monitoring and symptom control are cornerstones of CHF management [3]; hence, innovative strategies that are both effective and acceptable to patients are required to support traditional approaches to manage these aspects of care. Recent studies have reported that remote monitoring can improve health outcomes and reduce costs associated with CHF care by providing real-time physiological information to health care providers that can be acted on quickly, reducing the potential for progressive clinical deterioration and more complex care requirements [4,5]. These contemporary telemonitoring systems have the advantage of being delivered by portable devices, enabling patients to be monitored in real time from anywhere with access to the internet [6]. However, positive findings of the efficacy of telemonitoring in CHF management are not ubiquitous, with several studies identifying patients who are resistant to change [7-9].

The mixed results from telemonitoring studies may, in part, reflect the willingness or readiness of patients with CHF to engage with telemonitoring technology and to adhere to its use [10-12]. Because the prevalence of CHF increases with age, a high proportion of patients with CHF are over 75 years of age. This is a subset of the population in whom digital literacy has historically been low. However, the characteristics of the “over 75 years” demographic in modern times is different than that in prior generations, with increased life expectancy [13] and rapidly improving digital literacy [12] highlighting the need for new research in this area.

Although several recent studies have investigated the perceptions of telemonitoring in other clinical cohorts, such as patients with chronic kidney disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, or hypertension [10,11,14,15], there are few contemporary studies describing the perceptions of telemonitoring in patients with CHF. Remote monitoring in patients with CHF has specific objectives and unique challenges. For example, rapid fluctuations in body weight (>2 kg in 48 hours) may be the result of a variety of precipitating factors such as poor adherence to fluid and salt restrictions or noncompliance with medication, which can be rectified through modification of self-care behaviors, or it may be attributed to cardiac deterioration warranting urgent medical support [16]. This increases the complexity of telemonitoring and emphasizes the importance of integrated clinical support in telemonitoring ecosystems [16,17], highlighting the importance of user-friendly technology [18-20].

The Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care program for CHF (ITEC-CHF) was the first such program to incorporate telemonitoring supported by a 24-hour call center and first-line nurse-led CHF intervention in community care settings in Australia [21,22]. To minimize weight monitoring burdens and technical difficulties, the program introduced a novel “zero-touch” design, meaning that the participants were not required to interact with the technology other than stepping onto a scale for weight measurement as in usual care, and they did not need to have extra knowledge or skills to receive the telemonitoring intervention [21,22]. The objective of this study was to assess perceptions of telemonitoring among patients with CHF who participated in the ITEC-CHF study and to evaluate the usability of this model of care.

Figure 1. ITEC-CHF Telemonitoring System. ITEC-CHF: Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care Programme for Chronic Heart Failure.
View this figure

Study Setting and Design

A detailed description of the protocol for the ITEC-CHF study has been previously published [23]. Participants were recruited from the Frankston Hospital and Rosebud Hospital in Victoria, Australia, and Royal Perth Hospital and Fiona Stanley Hospital in Western Australia. Between January 2016 and December 2017, a total of 91 participants enrolled in the ITEC-CHF trial were mailed a survey and provided with a self-addressed and stamped envelope to return the survey at the end of the 6-month intervention. The survey consisted of two parts (see Multimedia Appendix 1). Part 1 was designed to evaluate the usability of the ITEC-CHF telemonitoring system and consisted of 9 questions, which were scored on a 5-point Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 2=disagree; 3=neither agree nor disagree; 4=agree; and 5=strongly agree). The 9 Likert scale questions addressed the following concepts adapted from the technology acceptance model (TAM) and attitude toward technology use: (1) ease of use, (2) participants’ confidence with managing CHF, (3) participants’ ability to navigate the technology, and (4) perceived usefulness [23-26]. These questions assessed the participants’ perceptions of telemonitoring and their comfort with using the technology involved. The TAM is an information technology framework for understanding users’ adoption and use of emerging health care technologies [25,26]. The model states that usefulness and ease of use are two essential elements in describing participants’ attitudes when using a new technology [26]. A number of studies support the validity of the TAM and its satisfactory explanation of end-user system usage [23,24,27]. Part 2 of the survey involved 3 open-ended questions to provide the participants an opportunity to express more detailed opinions about the ITEC-CHF telemonitoring system. The open-ended questions addressed perceived benefits and perceived barriers, as well as sought participants’ suggestions about improving the system. The estimated time to complete all questions was approximately 15 minutes.

ITEC-CHF Telemonitoring System

Eligible participants for the survey were required to have completed the ITEC-CHF intervention. The detailed protocol for this study has been published [22], but it is summarized as follows:

Participants were provided with electronic weighing scales (W550; ForaCare), and a computer tablet (Galaxy Tab A; Samsung). They were asked to weigh themselves on the provided scales daily. The measured weight entry was recorded in the weighing scale and then automatically transmitted to the tablet via a wireless Bluetooth function embedded in the scales. The tablet was preloaded with an Android application (MedTech Global) that received the weight entry and uploaded it to a proprietary software package, ManageMyHealth (MedTech Global). A web application in MMH automatically monitored the uploaded weight entries in real time to generate alerts and triage those alerts to project nurses and the call center. The alerts were designed in accordance with the National Heart Foundation of Australia’s Guidelines for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Chronic Heart [17].

The telemonitoring intervention consisted of three components: remote weight monitoring, structured telephone support, and nurse-led collaborative care. Telemonitoring was integrated with a personal assistance call service (MePACS) and a nurse care service according to their workflows in usual care.

Operators at the call center responded to the alerts in real time (24 hours, 7 days a week). In cases where the participant required clinical support, such as advice for assessing CHF symptoms or managing fluid and salt restriction, the call operator arranged a nurse follow-up.

The project nurses provided structured interventions according to three types of alerts: rapid weight fluctuation (±2 kg in 2 days), slow weight fluctuation (±5 kg in 28 days), and low-risk weight fluctuation (±1 kg over 24 hours). If a participant’s body weight fluctuation exceeded ±1 kg (but less than ±2 kg) over 24 hours, a questionnaire was automatically triggered and sent to the participant’s computer tablet. If the participant reported any of the clinical conditions in the questionnaire or did not respond to the questionnaire, the project nurses contacted the participant for a clinical assessment. However, if the response to the questionnaire determined the participant was asymptomatic, the alert was cancelled automatically to minimize unnecessary alerts to the project nurses.

Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria

The study’s inclusion criteria were as follows: patients (1) with CHF diagnosed by a clinician with an ejection fraction ≤40%, (2) who were able to weigh oneself safely, (3) who were at least 18 years of age, (4) who have a regular personal general practitioner (GP) or agree to use a designated GP, (5) who have a permanent residential address, and (6) without significant cognitive impairment. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with expected survival <12 months, (2) patients with end-stage renal failure on dialysis, (3) long-term nursing home residents, or (4) patients participating in any other clinical trial. All participants provided written informed consent.

Statistical Methods

Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software (version 26.0; SPSS Inc.). Descriptive statistics (mean and SD, frequencies, and percentages) were used to characterize the study population and described participants’ perceptions of usability of ITEC-CHF.

Open-ended questions were transcribed and imported into NVivo version 12 (QSR International) to facilitate the coding and to maximize the effectiveness and efficiency in sorting and merging the data according to themes reflecting common views and experiences. These were collated and supported by deidentified quotes from participants. Thematic analysis was performed to identify themes related to participants’ perceptions of the perceived benefits and perceived barriers, as well as their suggestions about improving the system, thus capturing participants’ understandings and allowing an in-depth analysis of the data [24]. Data were described, summarized, and then interpreted in relation to broader implications. The first author (SC), who is a nurse researcher with experience of research on CHF telemonitoring, familiarized herself with the data by reading the participants’ responses several times, while taking notes. Points of interest were noted while reading and re-reading the transcripts. Following production of an initial set of codes, a thematic map was developed, which presented themes and subthemes. Accounts were then re-read to ensure that coding was checked and that nothing had been overlooked. Themes and subthemes were then allocated. The last author (AM), who is an experienced researcher in the fields of cardiac rehabilitation and heart failure management, cross-checked the set of themes and was fully involved in the data interpretation and write-up for dissemination.

Ethics Approval

The ethics application for the trial site in Victoria has been approved by Peninsula Health Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC Reference: HREC/14/PH/27), and the ethics applications for trial sites in Western Australia have been approved by Royal Perth Hospital Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: 15-081) and the Curtin University Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference: HR 181/2014). This study complies with the Declaration of Helsinki. The trial has been registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, Trial ID: ACTRN12614000916640.


The survey response rate was 77% (67/91 surveys; Table 1). There were no significant differences between the demographics or clinical characteristics of the participants who completed the survey and the overall cohort who completed the ITEC-CHF study.

For the broad concepts of ease of use, confidence, navigability, and usefulness described in the TAM, 91% (61/67) of participants “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the telemonitoring system was easy to use, 85% (57/67) “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the technology improved their confidence in managing their CHF condition, 78% (51/65) “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the technology was easy to navigate, and 91% (59/65) “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the telemonitoring was useful. A few participants indicated that they “disagreed” or “strongly disagreed that the telemonitoring system was easy to use (3%), that the technology improved their confidence in managing their CHF condition (2%), that the technology was easy to navigate (2%), and that the telemonitoring was useful (2%).

Table 2 presents the information related to the 9 questions that were rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Each indicator was evaluated across multiple questions.

Table 1. Demographics and clinical characteristics of study participants.
CharacteristicValueP value

Completed survey (n=67)Completed ITEC-CHFa (N=91)
Age in years, mean (SD)69.8 (12.4)69.5 (12.3).89
Gender, n (%)

Male49 (73)66 (73).94

Female18 (27)25 (27).95
Highest education achieved, n (%)

Less than high school9 (13)10 (11).64

High school28 (42)41 (45).68

Trade or technical training8 (12)12 (13).81

College or university undergraduate19 (28)23 (25).67

Postgraduate3 (4)5 (5).78
BMI, mean (SD)32.1 (10.6)31.4 (9.6).86
NYHAb, n (%)

I5 (7)8 (9).77

II50 (75)68 (75).99

III11 (16)14 (15).86

IV1 (1)1 (1).83
LVEFc (%), mean (SD)28.7 (7.7)29.1 (7.1).97
Other medical conditions, n (%)

CHDd46 (68)58 (64).52

COPDe or asthma16 (24)23 (25).74

CKDf7 (10)10 (11).75

T2DMg22 (33)28 (31).87

aITEC-CHF: Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care Programme for Chronic Heart Failure

bNYHA: New York Heart Association Functional Classifcation.

cLVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction.

dCHD: coronary heart disease.

eCOPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

fCKD: chronic kidney disease.

gT2DM: type 2 diabetes mellitus

Table 2. Respondents’ grading based on usability survey questions.

Value, n (%)Score, mean (SD)
Survey itemStrongly disagreeDisagreeNeither agree nor disagreeAgreeStrongly agree
Ease of use (n=67)

The weighing scale was easy to use1 (1.5)1 (1.5)3 (4.5)9 (13.4)53 (79.1)4.7 (0.8)

The touch screen tablet was easy to use0 (0)3 (4.5)8 (11.9)17 (25.3)39 (58.2)4.4 (0.9)

The information given to me in how to weigh myself using the device was easy to understand0 (0)0 (0)2 (3)25 (37.3)40 (59.7)4.6 (0.6)
Confidence (n=67)

The technology helped me to manage my chronic heart condition0 (0)2 (3)2 (3)33 (49.3)30 (34.3)4.1 (0.8)

I feel more confident about managing my chronic heart failure after taking part in this research project0 (0)0 (0)2 (3)34 (50.8)13 (35.8)4.2 (0.7)

I found the weight reminders helpful on the touch screen tablet (n=56)0 (0)0 (0)11 (19.6)22 (39.3)23 (41.1)4.2 (0.8)

I found the symptom questions easy to respond to on the touch screen tablet (n=65)0 (0)3 (4.6)13 (20)20 (30.8)29 (44.6)4.2 (0.9)

When I forgot to weigh myself, I found the reminder calls helpful (n=63)1 (1.6)1 (1.6)6 (9.5)17 (27)38 (60.3)4.4 (0.9)

When my weight changed, I found the call from the Chronic Heart Failure nurse helpful (n=65)1 (1.5)0 (0)3 (4.6)23 (35.4)38 (58.5)4.5 (0.7)

Themes and Subthemes Analyzed

Participants provided feedback, including a range of benefits and barriers to using telemonitoring. Eight key themes related to the ITEC-CHF program emerged from responses to the open-ended questions. Quotes from participants are provided to support each theme.

Increased Support for Early Intervention of Clinical Deterioration

Clinicians were able to view patient health data easily and quickly, which enabled early detection of clinical deterioration. This meant that problems were detected quickly, and participants were able to receive an early intervention.

Weight fluctuation detected early and see GP same day.
Improved Compliance to Daily Weighing

The telemonitoring system helped participants get into a routine and inform them when a change occurred in their weight that was outside the predetermined limits.

Information exchange. Motivation to try and be healthy.
Learning about weight changes and fluid balance.
A Sense of Reassurance

Participants indicated they felt reassured that a clinician was behind the scenes reviewing their data.

Staff are competent.
Safety net that someone is watching.
Improved Self-care and Accountability

Participants felt accountable for their self-management because they were being monitored and would receive a reminder if they missed weighing themselves. This was reported as having had a positive effect on compliance to their self-management regime.

Weight measurement helped me with trying to maintain my health status.
Made me personally more accountable of fluid management.
Encouraging to weigh regularly. Help keep an eye on my diet.
Supportive of Self-Management

The ITEC-CHF environment helped participants feel supported in self-managing their condition while reflecting on the telemonitoring system in self-care.

Weighing reminders from MEPACS.
Don't feel alone. Familiar with nurses.
Reassuring that help is on hand.
Technical Difficulties

Some concerns expressed by participants were related to the technology, mainly due to Bluetooth connectivity issues in the early stages of the trial.

When machine doesn't register (scales).
Computer tablet not registering weight measured from scales.
Flexibility of Telemonitoring System

Some participants suggested they would have liked greater flexibility to be able to weigh themselves later than 10 AM to suit their lifestyle. This feedback was provided by participants who are employed, including those who work a night shift, to have the flexibility of the cutoff time to weigh in extended.

Sunday mornings when woken by MEPACS.
Extend time to midday.
Extend time limit.
System Not Suitable for All Patients

Participants who had lifestyles involving frequent traveling found the continuous telemonitoring unsuitable. In addition, some participants reported difficulty in answering the questions on the computer tablet in a timely manner.

Not suitable when going away on holiday.
Not enough time to answer symptoms questions.

Principal Findings

In this evaluation of the perceptions of telemonitoring among patients with CHF, the majority of participants “agreed” or “strongly agreed” that the intervention was feasible and helpful in their care. This included being easy to use (91% agreement) and helpful in improving their confidence in self-management (85% agreement). These findings are consistent with those reported from studies in other cohorts of people with chronic diseases that have evaluated perceptions of telemonitoring [10,11,14,15], but these results also provide new insights into the perceptions of patients with CHF.

Feedback from participants in this study highlights the importance of minimal user burden and ensuring user-friendly technology for telemonitoring to be acceptable to patients. High rates of satisfaction were observed with all the aspects of usability surveyed. Participants reported that the ITEC-CHF program was easy to use, easy to navigate, useful, and increased their confidence in managing their weight. Similarly, patients with chronic kidney disease were found to be highly accepting of using telemonitoring because they perceived it as being interactive and applicable in managing their condition [10]. In patients with hypertension, high levels of acceptability in using telemonitoring that relates to user-friendly technology has been previously reported [11]. User acceptance is especially important if telemonitoring is to be widely adopted; this is an important objective in the COVID-19 era when remotely delivered health care is increasingly being utilized to avoid subjecting patients to the risk of infection.

Compliance with care provider instructions and being self-disciplined in health management activities and self-care were two themes that were expressed by a high proportion of participants using the ITEC-CHF system. Compliance with self-care activities, such as diet, exercise, and medication adherence, are important factors in managing chronic conditions such as CHF given that successful disease management is, in part, dependent on patients’ ability and willingness to carry out self-care activities [17]. Moreover, confidence in undertaking self-management activities, particularly the ability to reliably self-identify symptoms associated with clinical deterioration and take appropriate action in a timely manner is an important component of chronic disease management [28]. The observation that telemonitoring is beneficial for weight surveillance represents an important clinical outcome given that fluctuations in body weight are a reliable way of detecting fluid imbalance, which can be associated with poor self-care compliance or disease exacerbation [29-31].

However, the acceptance of telemonitoring was not ubiquitous for participants in the current study. For example, the technology in its current form may not suit patients who travel frequently. Several participants also indicated that greater flexibility in the telemonitoring system would reduce disruption to their lives, especially during holidays and on weekends. It was suggested by some participants that having the ability to alter the time before an alert was sent (ie, changing it to after 10 AM) would reduce the psychological burden of the alert system during these periods. This is an important consideration because previous studies have found that insufficient flexibility in telemonitoring models may hinder the ongoing use of the system [32-36].

Participant feedback also highlighted the importance of engaging consumers with a lived experience of CHF in the co-design of telemonitoring to ensure that it is simple and easy to engage with by the end user. Participants stressed the importance of a system that is robust, with easily accessible technical support—a finding consistent with observations in other clinical groups [37,38]. This is critical because technical problems are known to be a significant impediment to the uptake and adherence to telemonitoring [30-32]. From the ITEC-CHF trial, it was evident that technical issues led to disengagement from the system when encountered by some participants [22]. Patients with CHF often have multiple competing comorbid health issues to manage in their lives, so a seamless system of telemonitoring takes on additional importance.


There are several limitations to the study that warrant highlighting. First, the results from the usability of the ITEC-CHF program were based on a relatively small sample size, so larger studies are required to confirm these findings. Second, there was no baseline data of participants’ perceptions of the usability of the system to provide a comparison for user satisfaction measured at the end of the study. However, this design would have its own limitations because participants would lack the experiential insight derived from being involved in the trial to answer some of the questions at baseline. Third, the findings are based on the experiences of participants who completed the trial and who are, therefore, likely to have a more favorable view of the telemonitoring system than those who dropped out. Finally, the single-group ITEC-CHF usability design precluded the assessment of the feasibility of randomization procedures, attrition, outcome measures, and acceptability in a control arm.


In this study evaluating the usability of a telemonitoring program in patients with CHF, a high overall usability rating was achieved, and the telemonitoring system was generally well accepted by users as an adjunct to their routine self-management activities. Participants in the study expressed that they were confident in using the ITEC-CHF system and reported many perceived benefits, including quick identification of early signs of clinical deterioration, which allows for faster response to manage the symptoms of CHF. Future trials that are powered to assess whether telemonitoring effects rehospitalization and mortality rates are required to determine whether these characteristics of telemonitoring translate to an improvement in clinical outcomes for patients with CHF.

Conflicts of Interest

None declared.

Multimedia Appendix 1

Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care Program for Chronic Heart Failure (ITEC-CHF) participant evaluation form.

DOCX File , 16 KB

  1. Cook C, Cole G, Asaria P, Jabbour R, Francis DP. The annual global economic burden of heart failure. Int J Cardiol 2014 Feb 15;171(3):368-376. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  2. Cowie MR, Anker SD, Cleland JGF, Felker GM, Filippatos G, Jaarsma T, et al. Improving care for patients with acute heart failure: before, during and after hospitalization. ESC Heart Fail 2014 Dec 21;1(2):110-145 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  3. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, ESC Scientific Document Group. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  4. Bashi N, Karunanithi M, Fatehi F, Ding H, Walters D. Remote monitoring of patients with heart failure: an overview of systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res 2017 Jan 20;19(1):e18 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  5. Queenan C, Cameron K, Snell A, Smalley J, Joglekar N. Patient heal thyself: reducing hospital readmissions with technology‐enabled continuity of care and patient activation. Prod Oper Manag 2019 Aug 11;28(11):2841-2853. [CrossRef]
  6. Wongvibulsin S, Martin SS, Steinhubl SR, Muse ED. Connected health technology for cardiovascular disease prevention and management. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med 2019 May 18;21(6):29-29 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  7. Tsai C, Kuo Y, Uei S. Influences of satisfaction with telecare and family trust in older Taiwanese people. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2014 Jan 27;11(2):1359-1368 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  8. Bishop TF, Press MJ, Mendelsohn JL, Casalino LP. Electronic communication improves access, but barriers to its widespread adoption remain. Health Aff (Millwood) 2013 Aug;32(8):1361-1367 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  9. Alnosayan N, Chatterjee S, Alluhaidan A, Lee E, Houston Feenstra L. Design and usability of a heart failure mHealth system: a pilot study. JMIR Hum Factors 2017 Mar 24;4(1):e9 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  10. Martínez García MA, Fernández Rosales MS, López Domínguez E, Hernández Velázquez Y, Domínguez Isidro S. Telemonitoring system for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis: Usability assessment based on a case study. PLoS One 2018;13(11):e0206600 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  11. Albrecht L, Wood PW, Fradette M, McAlister FA, Rabi D, Boulanger P, et al. Usability and acceptability of a home blood pressure telemonitoring device among community-dwelling senior citizens with hypertension: qualitative study. JMIR Aging 2018 Jul 24;1(2):e10975 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  12. Nancarrow S, Banbury A, Buckley J. Evaluation of a National Broadband Network-enabled Telehealth trial for older people with chronic disease. Aust Health Review 2016;40(6):641. [CrossRef]
  13. World Population Prospects 2019: Highlights. United Nations - Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Dynamics. 2019.   URL: [accessed 2021-09-01]
  14. Alghamdi SM, Janaudis-Ferreira T, Alhasani R, Ahmed S. Acceptance, adherence and dropout rates of individuals with COPD approached in telehealth interventions: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2019 Apr 25;9(4):e026794 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  15. Anglada-Martínez H, Martin-Conde M, Rovira-Illamola M, Sotoca-Momblona JM, Sequeira E, Aragunde V, et al. Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a web and smartphone-based medication self-management platform for chronically ill patients. J Med Syst 2016 Apr 12;40(4):99-99. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  16. National Heart Foundation of Australia. Living Well With Chronic Heart Failure. Melbourne: National Heart Foundation of Australia; 2018.
  17. NHFA CSANZ Heart Failure Guidelines Working Group, Atherton JJ, Sindone A, De Pasquale CG, Driscoll A, MacDonald PS, et al. National Heart Foundation of Australia and Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand: Guidelines for the Prevention, Detection, and Management of Heart Failure in Australia 2018. Heart Lung Circ 2018 Oct;27(10):1123-1208 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  18. Walker RC, Tong A, Howard K, Palmer SC. Patient expectations and experiences of remote monitoring for chronic diseases: Systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Int J Med Inform 2019 Apr;124:78-85 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  19. Nymberg VM, Bolmsjö BB, Wolff M, Calling S, Gerward S, Sandberg M. 'Having to learn this so late in our lives…' Swedish elderly patients' beliefs, experiences, attitudes and expectations of e-health in primary health care. Scand J Prim Health Care 2019 Mar;37(1):41-52 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  20. Heiney SP, Donevant SB, Arp Adams S, Parker PD, Chen H, Levkoff S. A smartphone app for self-management of heart failure in older African Americans: feasibility and usability study. JMIR Aging 2020 Apr 03;3(1):e17142 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  21. Ding H, Jayasena R, Chen SH, Maiorana A, Dowling A, Layland J, et al. The effects of telemonitoring on patient compliance with self-management recommendations and outcomes of the innovative telemonitoring enhanced care program for chronic heart failure: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 2020 Jul 08;22(7):e17559 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  22. Ding H, Jayasena R, Maiorana A, Dowling A, Chen S, Karunanithi M, et al. Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care Program for Chronic Heart Failure (ITEC-CHF) to improve guideline compliance and collaborative care: protocol of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2017 Oct 08;7(10):e017550 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  23. Wu J, Chen Y, Lin L. Empirical evaluation of the revised end user computing acceptance model. Comput Human Behav 2007 Jan;23(1):162-174. [CrossRef]
  24. Holden RJ, Karsh B. The technology acceptance model: its past and its future in health care. J Biomed Inform 2010 Feb;43(1):159-172 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  25. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly 1989 Sep;13(3):319. [CrossRef]
  26. Taherdoost H. A review of technology acceptance and adoption models and theories. Procedia Manuf 2018;22:960-967. [CrossRef]
  27. Giger J, Pope N, Vogt H, Gutierrez C, Newland L, Lemke J, et al. Remote patient monitoring acceptance trends among older adults residing in a frontier state. Comput Human Behav 2015 Mar;44:174-182 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef]
  28. Massouh A, Skouri H, Cook P, Huijer HAS, Khoury M, Meek P. Self-care confidence mediates self-care maintenance and management in patients with heart failure. Heart Lung 2020 Jan;49(1):30-35. [CrossRef] [Medline]
  29. Dendale P, De Keulenaer G, Troisfontaines P, Weytjens C, Mullens W, Elegeert I, et al. Effect of a telemonitoring-facilitated collaboration between general practitioner and heart failure clinic on mortality and rehospitalization rates in severe heart failure: the TEMA-HF 1 (TElemonitoring in the MAnagement of Heart Failure) study. Eur J Heart Fail 2012 Mar 18;14(3):333-340 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  30. Koehler F, Koehler K, Deckwart O, Prescher S, Wegscheider K, Kirwan B, et al. Efficacy of telemedical interventional management in patients with heart failure (TIM-HF2): a randomised, controlled, parallel-group, unmasked trial. The Lancet 2018 Sep;392(10152):1047-1057. [CrossRef]
  31. Melin M, Hägglund E, Ullman B, Persson H, Hagerman I. Effects of a tablet computer on self-care, quality of life, and knowledge. J Cardiovasc Nurs 2018;33(4):336-343. [CrossRef]
  32. May CR, Finch TL, Cornford J, Exley C, Gately C, Kirk S, et al. Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: what needs to be done? BMC Health Serv Res 2011 May 27;11(1):131-131 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  33. Hanley J, Pinnock H, Paterson M, McKinstry B. Implementing telemonitoring in primary care: learning from a large qualitative dataset gathered during a series of studies. BMC Fam Pract 2018 Jul 18;19(1):118-118 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  34. Ammenwerth E, Modre-Osprian R, Fetz B, Gstrein S, Krestan S, Dörler J, et al. HerzMobil, an integrated and collaborative telemonitoring-based disease management program for patients with heart failure: a feasibility study paving the way to routine care. JMIR Cardio 2018 Apr 30;2(1):e11 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  35. Ware P, Ross HJ, Cafazzo JA, Laporte A, Gordon K, Seto E. User-centered adaptation of an existing heart failure telemonitoring program to ensure sustainability and scalability: qualitative study. JMIR Cardio 2018 Dec 06;2(2):e11466 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  36. Ware P, Ross HJ, Cafazzo JA, Laporte A, Gordon K, Seto E. Evaluating the implementation of a mobile phone-based telemonitoring program: longitudinal study guided by the consolidated framework for implementation research. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2018 Jul 31;6(7):e10768 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  37. Vermeulen J, Verwey R, Hochstenbach LMJ, van der Weegen S, Man YP, de Witte LP. Experiences of multidisciplinary development team members during user-centered design of telecare products and services: a qualitative study. J Med Internet Res 2014 May 19;16(5):e124 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]
  38. Fischer B, Peine A, Östlund B. The importance of user involvement: a systematic review of involving older users in technology design. Gerontologist 2020 Sep 15;60(7):e513-e523 [FREE Full text] [CrossRef] [Medline]

CHF: chronic heart failure
HREC: Human Research Ethics Committee
ITEC-CHF: Innovative Telemonitoring Enhanced Care program for CHF
TAM: technology acceptance model

Edited by G Eysenbach; submitted 27.09.20; peer-reviewed by D Tao, V Stara, S Bhattacharjya; comments to author 18.11.20; revised version received 07.03.21; accepted 31.05.21; published 14.09.21


©Sheau Huey Chen, Iain Edwards, Rajiv Jayasena, Hang Ding, Mohanraj Karunanithi, Alison Dowling, Jamie Layland, Andrew Maiorana. Originally published in JMIR Cardio (, 14.09.2021.

This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Cardio, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.