Search Results (1 to 9 of 9 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 6 JMIR Nursing
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 JMIR Research Protocols
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 0 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 JMIR Formative Research
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Aging
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
VUC users not promptly referred to an ED (N=14,179) were more likely to have an ED visit within 72 hours, 7 days, and 30 days following the index VUC visit compared to matched in-person ED individuals [8]. However, 30-day hospital admissions were lower for the VUC group not promptly referred to the ED, but the length of hospital admission was longer than for patients presenting to the ED in person [8].
J Med Internet Res 2024;26:e50483
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
The authorship list was originally published as:
Kayleigh Gordon, Emily Seto, Katie N Dainty, Carolyn Steele Gray, Jane De Lacy
This has been changed to read as follows:
Kayleigh Gordon, Katie N Dainty, Carolyn Steele Gray, Jane De Lacy, Amika Shah, Emily Seto
Additionally, an Acknowledgments section has been added as follows:
This research was made possible by the funding support from a Canadian Institutes of Health Research Personalized Health Catalyst Grant (Funding Reference Number 155443).
JMIR Nursing 2023;6:e53833
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Virtual Specialist Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multimethod Patient Experience Study
Michael’s Hospital, 50.76% (n=301,105) of which were conducted virtually. Of note, only about 5176 visits (approximately 1.72%) were conducted virtually in the period of 2018-2019, before the pandemic, at the study hospital. In the specialty departments that participated in this study, 93,920 total ambulatory visits were conducted, over 50% of which were performed virtually. Among the virtual visits, over 96% were by phone.
JMIR Med Inform 2022;10(6):e37196
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
The remaining 8 patients were removed from the TM system for several reasons, including winter relocation (n=1), rehabilitation admission (n=1), unanticipated language barrier (n=1), inability to use a smartphone touchscreen (n=4), and death (n=1).
Table 2 presents the characteristics of the participants who completed the study. Overall, 65% (17/26) of the participants used the system for the full 6 months. The age of the participants ranged from 44 to 91 years, with a mean age of 73.8 (SD 13.3) years.
JMIR Nursing 2020;3(1):e22118
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section