Search Results (1 to 10 of 13 Results)
Download search results: CSV END BibTex RIS
Skip search results from other journals and go to results- 5 JMIR Formative Research
- 2 JMIR Aging
- 2 JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
- 2 JMIR mHealth and uHealth
- 1 JMIR Medical Informatics
- 1 Journal of Medical Internet Research
- 0 Medicine 2.0
- 0 Interactive Journal of Medical Research
- 0 iProceedings
- 0 JMIR Research Protocols
- 0 JMIR Human Factors
- 0 JMIR Serious Games
- 0 JMIR Mental Health
- 0 JMIR Rehabilitation and Assistive Technologies
- 0 JMIR Preprints
- 0 JMIR Bioinformatics and Biotechnology
- 0 JMIR Medical Education
- 0 JMIR Cancer
- 0 JMIR Challenges
- 0 JMIR Diabetes
- 0 JMIR Biomedical Engineering
- 0 JMIR Data
- 0 JMIR Cardio
- 0 Journal of Participatory Medicine
- 0 JMIR Dermatology
- 0 JMIR Pediatrics and Parenting
- 0 JMIR Perioperative Medicine
- 0 JMIR Nursing
- 0 JMIRx Med
- 0 JMIRx Bio
- 0 JMIR Infodemiology
- 0 Transfer Hub (manuscript eXchange)
- 0 JMIR AI
- 0 JMIR Neurotechnology
- 0 Asian/Pacific Island Nursing Journal
- 0 Online Journal of Public Health Informatics
- 0 JMIR XR and Spatial Computing (JMXR)
Yi et al [31] reported a mean depression score of 15.55 (SD 11.87) in Korean female college students, and Kim and Park [32] reported a mean score of 17.31 (SD 8.29) in Korean college students. As a cutoff score of 13 indicates a risk of clinical depression [29], most studies have found the average depression level in Korean young adults to be relatively high.
JMIR Form Res 2025;9:e71485
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Go back to the top of the page Skip and go to footer section
Similarly, Kim et al [34] developed a theoretical model that extends TAM and UTAUT to explain how older adults accept or reject mobile devices. This model comprises an additional phase, intention to learn, with three affecting factors (self-efficacy, conversion readiness, peer support) that determine the acceptance of mobile devices among older adults. They further validated this model through a comparative study with younger adults [37].
JMIR Aging 2022;5(1):e32957
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS
Exploring Children’s Engagement in Monitoring Indoor Air Quality: Longitudinal Study
JMIR Form Res 2022;6(1):e32404
Download Citation: END BibTex RIS