This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

e-Cardiology and Telemonitoring in Cardiology (222) Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) Care and Innovations (18) User Needs and Competencies (456) Digital Health, Telehealth and e-Innovation in Clinical Settings (560) Myocardial Infarction (Heart Attack) (56) Telehealth and Telemonitoring (2092) Patient Engagement and Empowerment (108) Clinical Communication, Electronic Consultation and Telehealth (761) Postoperative Monitoring and Telemonitoring (191)

Published on in Vol 9 (2025)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/67758, first published .
Barriers and Enablers to Routine Clinical Implementation of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Remote Monitoring in Australia Among Cardiologists, Cardiac Physiologists, Nurses, and Patients: Interview Study

Barriers and Enablers to Routine Clinical Implementation of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Remote Monitoring in Australia Among Cardiologists, Cardiac Physiologists, Nurses, and Patients: Interview Study

Barriers and Enablers to Routine Clinical Implementation of Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Remote Monitoring in Australia Among Cardiologists, Cardiac Physiologists, Nurses, and Patients: Interview Study

Authors of this article:

Brodie Sheahen1 Author Orcid Image ;   Edel T O'Hagan1 Author Orcid Image ;   Kenneth Cho1 Author Orcid Image ;   Tim Shaw1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Astin Lee3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Sean Lal2, 5 Author Orcid Image ;   Aaron L Sverdlov6 Author Orcid Image ;   Clara Chow1, 7 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
There are currently no tweets available for this article within the specified range.