This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Letters to the Editor (2) Electronic Health Records (1071) Coronary Heart Disease (81) Cross-Sectional Studies in Public Health (289) Cardiovascular Disease Prevention (142) Cardiac Risk and Cardiac Risk Calculators (47)

Published on in Vol 6, No 1 (2022): Jan-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/36801, first published .
Authors’ Reply to: Using Caution When Interpreting Gender-Based Relative Risk. Comment on “The Effect of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on Women Compared to Men: Longitudinal Retrospective Analysis”

Authors’ Reply to: Using Caution When Interpreting Gender-Based Relative Risk. Comment on “The Effect of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on Women Compared to Men: Longitudinal Retrospective Analysis”

Authors’ Reply to: Using Caution When Interpreting Gender-Based Relative Risk. Comment on “The Effect of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on Women Compared to Men: Longitudinal Retrospective Analysis”

Authors of this article:

Elma Dervic1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Carola Deischinger3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nina Haug1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Michael Leutner3 Author Orcid Image ;   Alexandra Kautzky-Willer3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Peter Klimek1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations (2) Metrics

There are no citations yet available for this article according to Crossref .