This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Letters to the Editor (2) Electronic Health Records (840) Coronary Heart Disease (62) Cross-Sectional Studies in Public Health (137) Cardiovascular Disease Prevention (97) Cardiac Risk and Cardiac Risk Calculators (26)

Published on in Vol 6 , No 1 (2022) :Jan-Jun

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/36801, first published .
Authors’ Reply to: Using Caution When Interpreting Gender-Based Relative Risk. Comment on “The Effect of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on Women Compared to Men: Longitudinal Retrospective Analysis”

Authors’ Reply to: Using Caution When Interpreting Gender-Based Relative Risk. Comment on “The Effect of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on Women Compared to Men: Longitudinal Retrospective Analysis”

Authors’ Reply to: Using Caution When Interpreting Gender-Based Relative Risk. Comment on “The Effect of Cardiovascular Comorbidities on Women Compared to Men: Longitudinal Retrospective Analysis”

Authors of this article:

Elma Dervic 1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Carola Deischinger 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Nina Haug 1, 2 Author Orcid Image ;   Michael Leutner 3 Author Orcid Image ;   Alexandra Kautzky-Willer 3, 4 Author Orcid Image ;   Peter Klimek 1, 2 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by Tweetations (2) Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
There are currently no tweets available for this article within the specified range.