This paper is in the following e-collection/theme issue:

Stroke (187) Clinical Information and Decision Making (1576) Machine Learning (1656)

Published on in Vol 7 (2023)

Preprints (earlier versions) of this paper are available at https://preprints.jmir.org/preprint/47736, first published .
Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study

Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study

Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study

Authors of this article:

Sermkiat Lolak1 Author Orcid Image ;   John Attia2 Author Orcid Image ;   Gareth J McKay3 Author Orcid Image ;   Ammarin Thakkinstian1 Author Orcid Image
Article Authors Cited by (10) Tweetations (2) Metrics
All Time | Last Month | Last Six Months | Last Year
JMIR Publications JMIR Publications @jmirpub

New in JMIR Cardio: Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stroke Risk Models: Retrospective Cohort Study https://t.co/1LmdZ4kFWh https://t.co/pLOnsORDAj

1:33 PM · Jul 26, 2023

1
1
JMIR Cardio JMIR Cardio @JMIR_Cardio

RT @jmirpub: New in JMIR Cardio: Comparing Explainable Machine Learning Approaches With Traditional Statistical Methods for Evaluating Stro…

1:34 PM · Jul 26, 2023

1
1