Published on in Vol 2, No 1 (2018): Jan-Jun

Consumer Wearable Devices for Activity Monitoring Among Individuals After a Stroke: A Prospective Comparison

Consumer Wearable Devices for Activity Monitoring Among Individuals After a Stroke: A Prospective Comparison

Consumer Wearable Devices for Activity Monitoring Among Individuals After a Stroke: A Prospective Comparison

Journals

  1. Silveira S, Motl R. Activity monitor use among persons with multiple sclerosis: Report on rate, pattern, and association with physical activity levels. Multiple Sclerosis Journal - Experimental, Translational and Clinical 2019;5(4):205521731988798 View
  2. Fuller D, Colwell E, Low J, Orychock K, Tobin M, Simango B, Buote R, Van Heerden D, Luan H, Cullen K, Slade L, Taylor N. Reliability and Validity of Commercially Available Wearable Devices for Measuring Steps, Energy Expenditure, and Heart Rate: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2020;8(9):e18694 View
  3. Jia Y, Wang W, Wen D, Liang L, Gao L, Lei J. Perceived user preferences and usability evaluation of mainstream wearable devices for health monitoring. PeerJ 2018;6:e5350 View
  4. Zhou L, DeAlmeida D, Parmanto B. Applying a User-Centered Approach to Building a Mobile Personal Health Record App: Development and Usability Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2019;7(7):e13194 View
  5. Lang C, Barth J, Holleran C, Konrad J, Bland M. Implementation of Wearable Sensing Technology for Movement: Pushing Forward into the Routine Physical Rehabilitation Care Field. Sensors 2020;20(20):5744 View
  6. Xie Z, Yadav S, Jo A. The association between electronic wearable devices and self-efficacy for managing health: a cross sectional study using 2019 HINTS data. Health and Technology 2021;11(2):331 View
  7. Katzan I, Schuster A, Kinzy T. Physical Activity Monitoring Using a Fitbit Device in Ischemic Stroke Patients: Prospective Cohort Feasibility Study. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2021;9(1):e14494 View
  8. Ramage E, Burke M, Galloway M, Graham I, Janssen H, Marsden D, Patterson A, Pollack M, Said C, Lynch E, English C. Fit for purpose. Co-production of complex behavioural interventions. A practical guide and exemplar of co-producing a telehealth-delivered exercise intervention for people with stroke. Health Research Policy and Systems 2022;20(1) View
  9. Giurgiu M, Timm I, Becker M, Schmidt S, Wunsch K, Nissen R, Davidovski D, Bussmann J, Nigg C, Reichert M, Ebner-Priemer U, Woll A, von Haaren-Mack B. Quality Evaluation of Free-living Validation Studies for the Assessment of 24-Hour Physical Behavior in Adults via Wearables: Systematic Review. JMIR mHealth and uHealth 2022;10(6):e36377 View
  10. Cornelius C, Fedewa A, Toland M. A classroom-based physical activity intervention for adolescents: Is there an effect on self-efficacy, physical activity, and on-task behavior?. Health Psychology Report 2020;8(4):408 View
  11. Holleran C, Bland M, Lang C. Comprehensive Assessment of the Activity Level of the ICF Using Both Capacity and Performance Measures: A Case Report. Archives of Rehabilitation Research and Clinical Translation 2023;5(3):100277 View
  12. Jørgensen A, Toftager M, Eghøj M, Ried-Larsen M, Bjørk Petersen C. Heart rate responses, agreement and accuracy among persons with severe disabilities participating in the indirect movement program: Team Twin—an observational study. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living 2023;5 View
  13. Ibrahim N, Lee W, Rampal S, Suhaimi A. Integrating the wrist-worn tracker in cardiac rehabilitation programmes: a scoping review. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation 2023;30(10):1 View
  14. Ibrahim N, Rampal S, Lee W, Pek E, Suhaimi A. Evaluation of Wrist-Worn Photoplethysmography Trackers with an Electrocardiogram in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease: A Validation Study. Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology 2024;15(1):12 View
  15. Hayes H, McFadden M, Gerace L, Brusseau T. Agreement of activity monitors for assessment of patients with sub-acute stroke in an inpatient rehabilitation facility. Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology 2024;19(6):2406 View
  16. Horder J, Mrotek L, Casadio M, Bassindale K, McGuire J, Scheidt R. Utility and usability of a wearable system and progressive-challenge cued exercise program for encouraging use of the more involved arm at-home after stroke—a feasibility study with case reports. Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation 2024;21(1) View
  17. Beswick E, Christides A, Symonds A, Johnson M, Fawcett T, Newton J, Lyle D, Weaver C, Chandran S, Pal S. Exploratory study to evaluate the acceptability of a wearable accelerometer to assess motor progression in motor neuron disease. Journal of Neurology 2024;271(8):5083 View
  18. Silva R, Silva S, Cardoso D, Quirino M, Silva M, Gomes L, Fernandes J, Oliveira R, Fernandes A, Ribeiro T. Psychometric properties of wearable technologies to assess post-stroke gait parameters: A systematic review. Gait & Posture 2024;113:543 View

Books/Policy Documents

  1. Cipriano M, Costagliola G, De Rosa M, Fuccella V, Shevchenko S. Innovation in Medicine and Healthcare. View
  2. Klamroth-Marganska V, Giovanoli S, Easthope C, Schönhammer J. Neurorehabilitation Technology. View
  3. Adans-Dester C, Lang C, Reinkensmeyer D, Bonato P. Neurorehabilitation Technology. View